Question: How much impact does ambient radiation, such as cosmic rays, have on the data collected at CERN? Is the LHC located so far underground in order to minimise this impact?
I’m not sure about CERN, but we detect cosmic rays quite regularly in our nitrogen cooled spectrometer. It’s fairly easy to remove them from the data for us. It might be harder in CERN tho, I’m sure James knows more about it.
Background radiation tends to be fairly constant and so you can normally take a background reading (take a measurement with no experiment happening) and then subtract this from your results (that’s what we do with our radiation diagnostics anyway).
The LHC isn’t that far underground because of cosmic rays – other particle accelerators are on or near the surface. Cosmic rays are an issue though. They are used to calibrate the detector when there isn’t any beam, but you also have to make sure when you detect a particle that it didn’t come from a cosmic ray. There are a few ways of doing this: the cosmic ray generally won’t arrive at the same time as a beam collision; the cosmic ray won’t point back to the collision point; generally the cosmic ray will be a different shape (and more isolated) in the detector.
Well, one problem is “cavern background.” The LHC beam is designed to be very intense, and after a while the large amount of radiation from the beam will cause the detector and the walls of the underground cavern to become a bit radioactive. The detector will observe the emissions from the cavern wall (mainly neutrons and photons) and add them to the energy we measure from the real collision events.
The way to deal with that is to have a good computer simulation of it and to measure on average what the contribution from this background is.
Comments
strangeness commented on :
Thank you for your answers! Are there any other types of radiation that are problematic for the LHC?
James_M commented on :
Well, one problem is “cavern background.” The LHC beam is designed to be very intense, and after a while the large amount of radiation from the beam will cause the detector and the walls of the underground cavern to become a bit radioactive. The detector will observe the emissions from the cavern wall (mainly neutrons and photons) and add them to the energy we measure from the real collision events.
The way to deal with that is to have a good computer simulation of it and to measure on average what the contribution from this background is.